aidentme / Comparison

How aidentme differs from other platforms

The AI brand visibility market splits into Western GEO platforms, SEO service modules and lightweight trackers. aidentme was built for a different job: evidence-based brand research across international markets — with full coverage of both global and Russian AI models.

Five key differences

  1. Hybrid collection: API plus live sessions. Most trackers query only public APIs and receive “sterile” answers without web search or regional specifics. aidentme complements the API stream with emulated live user sessions on regional proxies — you see the same answer a real buyer sees on their screen.
  2. Russian models — properly. Yandex Alice and GigaChat, not only ChatGPT and Gemini. For Russian-speaking audiences these systems are a visible share of AI answers that Western platforms do not cover at all.
  3. Deep citation mapping. A typical tracker states “you were mentioned in 20% of cases”. aidentme parses citations and intermediate sources to the end of the chain: which articles, review platforms and databases form the model’s opinion — and where content needs fixing or placing.
  4. Findings, not just charts. Instead of bare Share of Voice — analyst-verified findings with an evidence status, plus ready recommendations for copywriters and SEO: which wording and pages are needed for the models to start citing your materials.
  5. An enterprise contour. Isolated proxy pools, queries not used to train third-party models, raw answers exported as an evidence base, an API for BI systems — and a research-only format for regulated categories.

The market map

Competitor feature lists change quickly; check their current documentation before choosing. We compare approaches, not price lists.

Get a platform demo

We will show the dashboard on your category: brands, competitors, prompts, metrics. ChatGPT / Claude / Gemini / Alice / GigaChat.

Request a demo